Known to many “British scientists” and their often useless studies are the product of improper allocation and evaluation of scientific research utility. How many people are psychopaths?
To such conclusion the group of mathematicians who have published their findings in the journal PLoS Biology.
The Huge amount of money is spent on research, the results of which can not be believed, and quite a number of discoveries, which claim such scholars are often false, but they are often published and discussed, said Andrew Higginson from the University of Exeter (UK).
Higginson and his colleague Marcus Munafo from the University of Bristol (UK) came to this conclusion after an analysis by the methods of mathematics and statistics success of submission of grant applications and their “results” in the form of scientific publications. How many people are in the world suffer from anxiety?
The authors have tried to figure out whether there is some guiding principle in the evaluation of research projects that the scientists propose to the Court of sponsors or no such criteria. If such a principle exists, scientists deliberately (climbers) or unconsciously, will customize its interests under it for better opportunities.
Every doctor asks the question: “How many people are psychopaths”? Mathematicians have rules used by grant agencies the UK (UKREF) and Australia (AER) and used them to create a computer model. In this model, scientist “careerist” trying to format their studies so as to continually achieve success in applications to a virtual “grant commission.”
